Combs Spouts Off

"It's my opinion and it's very true."

  • Calendar

    July 2010
    S M T W T F S
     123
    45678910
    11121314151617
    18192021222324
    25262728293031
  • Recent Posts

  • Tag Cloud

  • Archives

Archive for July 16th, 2010

Sentence first, verdict afterwards

Posted by Richard on July 16, 2010

Earlier in the week, anonymous sources in the Dept. of Transportation leaked the data recorder findings from "sudden acceleration" Toyotas. Just as many of us predicted, and just as in the 1989 Audi 5000 "sudden acceleration" brouhaha, it turns out that the cause of the acceleration was … stepping on the accelerator!

In all of the dozens of cases, the throttle was wide open and the brakes were never applied. No surprise there — Car & Driver demonstrated last December that if you mash both the accelerator and the brakes, the brakes win. Every time. Even in a 540-hp Roush Stage 3 Mustang.

Thursday evening, Rick Manning of Americans for Limited Government raised the question of the government's motives in punishing Toyota before the evidence was in: 

Just six months ago, the Obama Administration’s public relations machine was in full gear deriding Toyota for putting consumers at risk, fining them more than $16 million, and declaring Toyota guilty for everyone in the world to hear. Lawsuits were filed, Congressional hearings were held, and most importantly Toyotas went unsold, while GM sales increased.

Now, it looks like this sudden acceleration problem was caused by, get this, drivers hitting the accelerator pedal rather than the brake, and Toyota owners not being smart enough to keep their floor mats from underneath the accelerator, causing it to stick in the fully-engaged position.

I guess that the government’s next step will be to require a safety yellow sticker on every dashboard that says, “Warning: Pressing down on the accelerator will result on sudden acceleration.”

The real issue here is that the very motives of the government are in question in publicly convicting Toyota before any real evidence had been collected.

Was the rush to judgment based upon the Obama Administration’s general dislike for every business, or was it based upon the need to jumpstart the sales of General Motors vehicles?

We will never actually know the truth.

The government is supposed to be the impartial referee, and it's betting on the outcome of the game. How can there not be at least the appearance of impropriety?  

Now that their products have been exonerated, I wonder if the folks at Toyota will get their $16 million back. In any case, they have a right to echo Reagan's Labor Secretary, Ray Donovan. After being acquitted of the charges against him, Donovan famously asked "How do I get my reputation back?"

Subscribe To Site:

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »

CUT condemns Norton attack ad

Posted by Richard on July 16, 2010

On Tuesday, the Colorado Union of Taxpayers issued a press release condemning Republican senatorial candidate Jane Norton's negative ad against her primary opponent, Ken Buck — an ad I called a sleazy smear. Now that I've finally noticed it, here is the text of the CUT press release (emphasis added):

The Colorado Union of Taxpayers called for U.S. Senate candidate to cease her personal attacks on Greg Golyansky, who serves on the CUT Board of Directors. Golyansky was first elected to the CUT Board in 2003, and has served continuously since then.

In negative ads against Senate candidate Ken Buck, Norton calls Buck a "A government lawyer who doesn't follow the rules"-a charge that the Denver's Channel 7 News labeled "misleading." http://www.thedenverchannel.com/politics/24087213/detail.html

The Norton ad darkly claims that "Ken Buck was investigated for ethics violations; improperly undermining the prosecution of pawn shop owner Gregory Golyansky."

The Norton attack omits some key facts: Henry Solano, who had been appointed United States Attorney by President Clinton, determined that his office should not bring a case against Golyansky. But in 1999, the new U.S. Attorney, Tom Strickland, decided to make the case into a prop for his future Senate campaign, and ordered that felony charges be filed against Golyansky and two of his relatives. Every career prosecutor in the Colorado U.S. Attorney's Office, including Ken Buck, refused to prosecute the case. So the case was given to two new lawyers whom Strickland had hired. The case was so obviously weak that it ended up with Golyansky pleading guilty to one misdemeanor, and being sentenced to a single day of probation.

CUT President Marty Neilson said, "Jane Norton's attacks on Gregory Golyansky are outrageous, mean-spirited, and misleading. Norton claims that she is the taxpayer's friend, but she is practicing character assassination against a genuine taxpayer advocate. The Colorado Union of Taxpayers calls on Jane Norton to cease these malicious and misleading advertisements."

Thank you, Marty Neilson. Thank you, Ken Buck, for having the courage to resist Tom Strickland's efforts to persecute the Golyanskys in order to further his career. And shame on you, Jane Norton!

Subscribe To Site:

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , | 2 Comments »