Combs Spouts Off

"It's my opinion and it's very true."

  • Calendar

    February 2026
    S M T W T F S
    1234567
    891011121314
    15161718192021
    22232425262728
  • Recent Posts

  • Tag Cloud

  • Archives

Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

Open up the black box

Posted by Richard on July 6, 2005

Mark at Cutting Edge of Ecstasy has an excellent post about aid to Africa:

I want to end the needless misery in Africa as much as Bob Geldof, but his solution is to keep using a hammer to turn a screw. …

We’ve tried the easy ways of ending the suffering in Africa and they haven’t worked. Sending money and cell phones hasn’t worked. Singing about it falls below the threshold of deserving consideration as a solution. The problem isn’t with the donors, and that leaves only one place to look for the answer – the recipients.

I’m not suggesting that a starving infant is to blame, but what happens to the money we send? Who gets it and what are they doing with it? It’s as if there’s this black box labeled ‘African Aid’. We keep putting money in, but better living conditions never seem to come out. How long do we have to keep doing this until someone wants to look inside of the box? We have to ask tough questions and propose tough solutions, for the donors as well as the recipients.

Nice metaphor. Of course, anyone who isn’t delusional knows that inside the black box are a bunch of cynical, heartless, control-freak thieves with Swiss bank accounts and insatiable greed, clinging desperately to the discredited socialist paradigm that they use to justify their parasitic existence, even though it condemns their populations to abject poverty in the midst of one of the most resource-rich parts of the earth.

Why do people like Geldoff and Bono, apparently intelligent, informed, and caring people, seem to just shrug and accept this state of affairs as an unchangeable fact of life? Why do they think the solution is shoving money into the box faster than the kleptocrats can steal it?

Subscribe To Site:

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment »

Goldberg interview

Posted by Richard on July 6, 2005

Be sure to read Captain Ed’s two-part interview with Bernard Goldberg (part 1, part 2) regarding Goldberg’s new book,  The 100 People Who Are Screwing Up America (And Al Franken Is #37). Fascinating. I’ve seen Goldberg described as having moved from strongly liberal to libertarian/conservative. Captain Ed asked him if he considers himself more conservative now:

BG: Yeah, that’s a good question. The answer is yes, because liberals have made it really difficult for a lot of us to be liberals. What I said was that I was a liberal in the old-fashioned sense. I was a liberal the way Hubert Humphrey and John Kennedy were liberals. But I am not — underline not — a liberal the way Al Franken and Michael Moore are liberals. They have made it more and more difficult. I’ll tell you, I think most liberals in this country are decent people. They go to jobs, they work hard, they support their families, they care about their mother, their kids, their wives, their husbands – that’s not the issue.

The issue is the people who speak loudest for the liberals, the voice of Liberal America. They are the ones doing a lot of harm to this culture. …

… I’ll tell you what, and this is really important. Even when I agree with liberals on this issue or that issue, I no longer want to be associated with them, because they’re elitist snobs. Again, these are the ones who speak for liberalism in America, the ones who speak the loudest. They’re liberal snobs, and I’m with Tom Wolfe, who recently said, “I want it registered that I’m not one of them.”

I can relate to that sentiment. In the wake of 9/11 and leading up to the Iraq invasion, I spent a lot of time learning about Islam and terrorist organizations, reading widely, and rethinking some long-held beliefs. I was very much in doubt about a lot of things, but there was one thing about which I quickly became certain: even if I concluded that the Bush doctrine was wrong, I’d be embarrassed to be associated with the people on the left who shared that belief.

(BTW, the book link is copied from Captain’s Quarters; I’m not an Amazon affiliate, but he is, so buy the book using his link to thank him for the interview.)

Subscribe To Site:

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

The EU’s Libyan project

Posted by Richard on July 6, 2005

Is it just me, or is there something chilling about Germany and Italy setting up labor camps in Libya "to facilitate the monitored supply of unskilled labor" to the European Union?

According to German-Foreign-Policy.com, the EU is deploying a task force to work with the Libyan coast guard to intercept African migrants — "economic refugees" — in the Mediterranean. But there’s more, because the EU does want migrant workers (emphasis added):

Simultaneously transit camps, for screening migrants as to their suitability as workers in the legally registered labor force, will be established on the Libyan coastline. "Europe" desperately needs "more migration" declared Franco Frattini, European Commission Vice-President for Justice, Freedom and Security, Monday in Dublin. Amnesty International protested the German inspired border policy on the northern coast of Africa. Libya does not have a "functioning system of asylum" and is known for its "catastrophic prison conditions," Amnesty says in its statement. 

What hope is there for a government that combines the departments or agencies responsible for justice, freedom, and security? But I digress. The story explains the EU’s goals and plans further:

Not all of those migrants stranded in the camps are destined to be held prisoner and … deported back to Sub-Saharan Africa or to Arab countries. According to studies of the EU Commissioner for "Justice, Freedom and Security" there is a much more desperate need to have people, who will "fill up the labor market" and will "offset the rising costs of our welfare system." This objective can be better reached through the "effective channeling of the flow of the legal migration" and "combating" the illegal, explains Frattini. … According to this scheme, a contingent of cheap migrants will be kept available in Libya, who, when needed, can be transported over the Mediterranean and after sufficient exploitation, be sent back again.

What about the language barrier? And how will the EU ensure that, after "sufficient exploitation," the migrants can be sent back? They’ve thought of those concerns:

In order to facilitate the monitored supply of unskilled labor and to avoid that their productive potential is hampered by speech barriers, Fratini proposes simple language courses, paid for by the EU that would be given "in the countries of origin". Therefore migrants selected in Libya can learn a few words in German, French or Spanish – depending on to which country they are destined – in order to be able to understand work instructions and to have something to do in the camp until they are dispatched. Knowledge surpassing what is needed for the daily work is not necessary, because the migrants will literally be confined to a barracks situation.

Let’s see, the migrant workers will be kept in "camps" in Libya and "confined to a barracks situation" in Europe. And there seems to be some conflating of two different functions of the Libyan camps: imprisoning illegal migrants and screening legal migrant labor. I wonder how the Libyans will ensure that the labor supply matches the EU’s demand. I wonder if the EU cares.

The article indulges in some heavy speculation/analysis/editorializing, to disturbing effect, although the awkward English and obliqueness of these statements make the author’s intent unclear:

The Libyan Project is noticeably patterned after previous models and reminds of examples of concentrated camps, as had been typically used for profit maximizing processes within colonial and industrialization policy. This is the organized method of bringing together large masses of people, who with minimal costs of reproduction perform different tasks of work. The key to success for large-scale projects such as this, depend upon a reservoir of labor force at the constant disposal, if necessary they can again be set free or be totally used up (death).

I did a double take over "concentrated camps" and checked the German-language version of the article to see how it appeared. It’s "konzentrierter Lagerhaltung," so I guess "concentrated" is an accurate translation. At least the German version didn’t say "Konzentrationslager."

I wonder what "Arbeit Macht Frei" would be in Arabic.

Subscribe To Site:

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

Tanks and pears

Posted by Richard on July 6, 2005

Go read neo-neocon’s latest (5th) installment in her series, "A mind is a difficult thing to change." The series is about how a lifelong liberal Democrat became a neocon after 9/11. Long, thought-provoking essays, kind of like a more introspective, less intense Bill Whittle.

In this installment, she discusses the period from the mid-70s to 2001, during which she wasn’t very political or even tuned into world affairs. Tanks and pears? A story from a Milan Kundera novel — you’ll have to read the post.

I found her reaction to the fall of the Soviet Union interesting (emphasis added):

…  I knew that I hadn’t paid proper attention to the news in recent years, so for a while I wondered whether I had missed something. But when I tried to read more about it, I couldn’t find anything that made sense to me; when I tried to ask other people whether anyone had seen this coming, I was met with resounding silence, indifference, shrugs.

Surely, I asked friends and family, the Soviet experts at the NY Times or even in the State Department or at Harvard, surely they had seen this coming, right? If not, then
why not?

It would be an overstatement to say I became obsessed with this question. But it certainly was the world event that engaged my interest more than anything since Vietnam, and my puzzlement about it was profound. If the experts–academic, governmental, and media–had been unable to foresee this, then how could I trust them to guide me in the future? In retrospect, it was probably the first time I began to distrust my usual sources of information, although I certainly didn’t see them as lying–I saw them as incompetent, really no better than bad fortunetellers.

Aha, the first tentative step away from liberal dogma: beginning to distrust your usual sources of information.

HT: David Aitken 

Subscribe To Site:

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

Carnival of Liberty

Posted by Richard on July 4, 2005

While you’re recovering from eating all that seared flesh, don’t forget to check out some of the wonderful links at the first ever Carnival of Liberty. It may be too big a feast to devour in one sitting, so pace yourself, digest a tasty post or three, and just keep going back.

Subscribe To Site:

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

Brown! Brown! Brown!

Posted by Richard on July 4, 2005

Everyone knows that Pres. Bush will be under some pressure to replace Sandra Day O’Connor with a woman, right? And I, for one, sure don’t want another Souter or Kennedy (someone recently suggested that Gonzales was Spanish for "Souter"). So why do I keep reading about Gonzales, Garza, Luttig, McConnell, etc? To me, there’s an obvious female candidate who is uniquely positioned from a public relations standpoint due to the profoundly unpopular Kelo decision.

During the battle over confirmation of California Supreme Court Justice Janice Rogers Brown to the D.C. Circuit Court, Democrats denounced her as radical, extreme, and out of the mainstream. One of the examples they frequently cited was her dissent in a takings case, San Remo Hotel v. San Francisco, in 2002.

I blogged about this a couple of months ago in my first post about Brown, quoting Brown critic Stuart Taylor Jr. on San Remo Hotel:  

… In dissent, Brown wrote that "property ownership is the essential prerequisite of liberty" and that the city had engaged in "theft" and "turn[ed] a democracy into a kleptocracy." Criticizing the Supreme Court’s "labyrinthine and compartmentalized" case law on the Constitution’s requirement of "just compensation" for governmental "takings" of private property, she called for a new "conceptual approach" that would invalidate laws redistributing wealth from one group to another.

I want Bush to name Janice Rogers Brown and explain his choice thusly:

"During the Senate confirmation battle over Judge Brown’s appointment to the D.C. Circuit Court, Democratic Senators argued that her strong defense of property rights was extreme and out of the mainstream. In the wake of the Kelo decision, the public outrage across the political spectrum has made it clear that those Democratic Senators were wrong. When she forcefully defends our property rights, Janice Rogers Brown speaks for the American people. And the American people need her voice on the Supreme Court."

Let the Democrats try to justify a filibuster (having abandoned one just weeks ago) against a black woman who is a forceful and articulate defender of the Fourth and Fifth Amendments.

Subscribe To Site:

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

Celebrate liberty

Posted by Richard on July 4, 2005

Pres. George W. Bush at Independence Day celebration, West Virginia University Morgantown:

As we celebrate the Fourth of July, we rededicate ourselves to the ideals that inspired our founders. During that hot summer in Philadelphia more than 200 years ago, from our desperate fight for independence to the darkest days of a civil war, to the hard-fought battles of the 20th century, there were many chances to lose our heart, our nerve, or our way. But Americans have always held firm, because we have always believed in certain truths: We know that the freedom we defend is meant for all men and women, and for all times. (Applause.) And we know that when the work is hard, the proper response is not retreat; it is courage. (Applause.)

Happy Independence Day! Do something for the men and women in uniform. Then, get away from that computer and celebrate liberty!

Subscribe To Site:

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

Many ways to support troops

Posted by Richard on July 3, 2005

Sometimes I overthink things. In a post Friday morning, I mentioned a project to send coffee and cookies to troops in Iraq and Afghanistan. Based on some off-line feedback I got, I’ve been thinking a lot about that post.

Was it too glib and shallow? As a way to support the troops, is a coffee and cookies package not sufficiently serious?  Are "support the troops" TV ads and cookie shipments just hypocritical, rah-rah, chickenhawk cheerleading? After all, I avoided Vietnam…

No, no, and no, I finally decided. I suppose I’ll always feel a bit uncomfortable, maybe guilty, about Vietnam. But this war isn’t Vietnam — different beginning (we were attacked — repeatedly), different (much better) goals, much bigger stakes.  And no draftees.

It’s OK to support this war, even if you didn’t serve when you were young. It’s OK to express your support for the troops in a variety of ways, including sending coffee and cookies.

A box of cookies from a stranger is more than a brief pleasant treat to share with comrades. It says, "You don’t know me, but I wanted to say thank you and to express my admiration, respect, and best wishes."

I suspect such gestures mean a lot to the service men and women who receive them.

If you can spare a few bucks, do something this Independence Day to support our troops or their families. Or their survivors. In the wake of the terrible loss of SEAL and SOAR (Special Operations Aviation Regiment) forces in Afghanistan, I’ve donated to the United Warrior Survivor Foundation, which provides assistance to the widows of Special Operations personnel killed in the line of duty. Here are some other suggestions:

  • Soldiers’ Angels — Has a wide range of worthwhile programs, from "adopting" a soldier to providing supplies for wounded soldiers (often transported out before they can gather personal items) to sending Kevlar blankets for "up-armoring" HumVees, and more. You can even donate air miles to benefit soldiers and their families.
  • Wounded Warrior Project — Helps seriously injured soldiers, including amputees, deal with the challenges they face, obtain assistance, support each other, and return to civilian life.
  • Fisher House — Provides "homes away from home" at every major military medical facility so that family members can be with their injured service man or woman.
  • And of course, don’t forget the "mainstream" veterans’ groups that have been doing fine work for many years, the American Legion and VFW. And I send the USO a few bucks around Christmas; they’ve been making life better for the troops for a long time.

Want still more ideas? Go to America Supports You and click "Here’s How You Can Help" on the left. There must be well over 200 organizations listed through which you can help in some way. If you did real well with your stock options, give fifty or a hundred bucks to each one.

Subscribe To Site:

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment »

Help air anti-Durbin, pro-troops ads

Posted by Richard on July 1, 2005

Move America Forward, the organization that brought you the "I heart Gitmo" bumper sticker, needs your help for their latest TV ad campaign, which starts July 4. You can watch the ad at their site. It’s a very nicely done, simple 30-second message something like this: Some liberals, like Sen. Durbin, have slandered our troops. But these aren’t the faces of torturers, they’re heroes, they’re our sons and daughters fighting for freedom around the world. Support our troops.

The ad will run nationally on Fox News and on broadcast affiliates in Illinois. But, right now, Move America Forward doesn’t have the funds to air the ad as often as it should for an effective campaign. Move America Forward needs to raise another $100,000 in online contributions this weekend. Can you help? Go to Move America Forward and make a contribution, even if it’s only $10 or $20.

Or maybe you’d like to support one of Move America Forward‘s other projects, such as sending gourmet coffee and cookies to our troops in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Subscribe To Site:

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

Non-news: suicide bombers not Iraqis

Posted by Richard on July 1, 2005

LGF posted an AP story earlier today announcing breathlessly that the vast majority of suicide bombers in Iraq have been foreigners. Yawn. The only people who might be surprised by this probably dismiss it as a Rove trick.

Readers of the Grand Junction, CO, Daily Sentinel heard this straight from the horse’s mouth a couple of weeks ago. Shortly after, so did readers of Chrenkoff and my blog. In the Daily Sentinel story about Grand Junction’s Col. Jim West, he not only reported that most suicide bombers were non-Iraqis, he said that not all of them went willingly to their fate:

"He was trying to drive into a busy checkpoint and the Marine guards wounded him and disabled his car before he could reach the intersection and activate the bomb," West wrote. "When they opened the door to remove him, they found him chained to the seat with his hands taped to the steering wheel. He had an activation switch on his body that he could use but they also found a remote-control activation device under the front seat. It was hidden in the floor of the car so he probably didn’t know it was there… He was going to die whether he wanted to or not."

A guard activated a radio-jamming device immediately so the bomb couldn’t be detonated, West wrote.

The driver was "yelling and very agitated and had a glazed look," West said in a telephone interview. It turned out he also was heavily drugged, West said.

The AP story does add breadth and detail to the story of foreign suicide bombers. Of course, some of the details aren’t presented as accurately as one might wish:

There have been a few exceptions.

On election day Jan. 30, a mentally handicapped Iraqi boy, wearing a suicide vest, attacked a polling station.

The poor kid didn’t "attack" a polling station. The jihadists strapped explosives on him and made him start walking toward the polling station. The kid didn’t know what was happening, but he became confused or scared and turned around. Started walking back where he came from.

They remotely detonated him.

Attacked a polling station, my ass.

Subscribe To Site:

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Making money on the Internet

Posted by Richard on June 30, 2005

Sometimes I’m amazed at how clever students and other people who want to avoid real work can be. The newest member of the Life, Liberty, Property community, Jacqueline Passey, reports that she’s made a tidy little profit at the expense of online casinos competing for new customers:

…  One way they attract new customers is by literally giving away money.  They must figure that most people will lose this money back to them and then some.  Since most people are stupid and lack self control, they’re right.  However, clever players can profit from these free money bonuses by choosing games with a low house advantage (like blackjack or video poker), playing perfectly (with a strategy card) and limiting their play to the minimum required to qualify for the bonus offer.

Personally, over the past six weeks I’ve made $1636.54 at $22.66 per hour doing this.  Not an exciting amount of money for those of you with real jobs, but it’s much better than the wages, schedules, and working conditions of the employment opportunities available to me as a full time student in Bellingham. 

If you’re interested, she provides detailed — boy, are they detailed! — step-by-step instructions. And note that she thinks time is of the essence:

… unfortunately we are nearing the end of the window of opportunity between when the casinos decided, “Hey!  Let’s attract new customers by giving away money!” and realized, “Oh, shit!  People have figured out how to exploit this promotion and we’re losing money on it!”  So the terms and conditions of the bonus offers are changing to make them unprofitable.  Also, most bonus offers are for first deposits only, and eventually you will run out of casinos.  So, get in on this now while the getting is good, but don’t count on it to last for much longer.

So how detailed are those instructions? There are 14 steps, some of which have lengthy substeps. Here is Step 13:

13. Keep some sort of record of your results.  I have an Excel spreadsheet on which I record:
Casino: Name of the casino
Start: Date I opened my casino account and deposited
Cleared: Date I finished clearing the wagering requirement for the bonus
C. Out: Date I initiated cashing out my winnings
Rcvd: Date I received my cash out in my Neteller account
URL: URL of the casino website
Software: Software the casino is running
Group: If the casino belongs to a group of casinos, the name of the group is here
C: Currency I played in (dollars or pounds)
FX In: The foreign exchange rate on my casino deposit
Deposit: The deposit amount in the currency I played in
Dep in $: The deposit amount in dollars
Bonus: The bonus amount in the currency I played in
Bon in $: The bonus amount in dollars
Type: Whether it is a cashable or sticky bonus (right now I am only playing cashable bonuses, but eventually I will play stickies too and want to keep track of which is which)
WR: Wagering requirement in the currency I played in
Game: Which game I played
HA: House advantage of that game
EV: Expected value of profit in the currency I played in
EV in $: Expected value of profit in dollars
Bet: Amount I bet per hand
Hands: How many hands I played
Hours: How many hours I played
W/L: How much I won or lost playing
AV: Actual value of profit (or loss) in the currency I played in
AV in $: Actual value of profit (or loss) in dollars
FX Out: The foreign exchange rate on my casino withdrawal.
Cash: How much I cashed out back to Neteller
Profit: How much profit (or loss) I made at this casino
$/Hour: How much profit (or loss) I made per hour at this casino
Hands/Hr: How many hands I played per hour at this casino
R Profit: Running profit
R Time: Running hours
R $/Hr: Running hourly rate
R EV: Running expected profit
% of EV: What percentage of the expected profit is my actual profit?

But I am an obsessive data freak.  You can probably get by with a lot less information.

Yowsa! Jacqueline, my dear, you are an obsessive data freak’s obsessive data freak.

Subscribe To Site:

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment »

Iraqis in Mexico

Posted by Richard on June 30, 2005

Two Iraqis were arrested in Mexico near the U.S. border yesterday. The Washington Times has a long story:

  The Mexican Attorney General’s Office said Samir Yousif Shana and Munir Yousif Shana were taken into custody by Mexican federal agents, along with two suspected alien smugglers, in the Paso del Aguila district of Tecate, some 30 miles east of San Diego.

    Mexican authorities said investigators were told the Iraqis had been advised by an unidentified person in Baghdad that he could arrange for them to be smuggled across the U.S. border once they got to Mexico.
    The Baghdad smuggler demonstrates that the porousness of the U.S.-Mexico border is becoming "common knowledge" on the Arab street, one U.S. law-enforcement official said yesterday.

That’s fairly sobering to those of us who actually worry about terrorism (i.e., don’t live in Howard Dean’s "reality-based" pre-9/11 world). But before you get too worked up about these guys, there’s a detail that neither the rather breathless Washington Times story nor the much shorter AP story (at least as presented here and here) dug up (or bothered to mention). But local reporter Sandra Dibble of the San Diego Union-Tribune thought it was important:

The two Iraqis claim to be members of the Chaldean Christian minority, said Liza Davis, spokeswoman for the U.S. Consulate in Tijuana. Mexican immigration officials have flown the pair to Mexico City for eventual deportation to Iraq, she said.

Just five years ago, Baja California was a major transit point for Iraqi Chaldeans trying to join their family members across the border. But the once-steady flow has dwindled to a trickle, say U.S. officials and members of the Chaldean community in San Diego.

So, relax for now. As far as anyone can tell, there is no Chaldeafascist terrorist movement.

Nevertheless, there is reason for concern, as The Washington Times documents:

    But Adm. James Loy, former Department of Homeland Security deputy secretary, told the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence in February that "recent information from ongoing investigations, detentions and emerging threat streams strongly suggests that al Qaeda has considered using the southwestern border to infiltrate the United States."
    Adm. Loy testified that al Qaeda operatives believe they can pay to get into the country through Mexico and that entering illegally was "more advantageous than legal entry."
    He also said the international street gang Mara Salvatrucha, also known as MS-13, was an emerging national security threat and suggested that al Qaeda terrorists may have targeted the gang’s illegal-alien smuggling operations to gain entry to this country. 
    In September, The Washington Times reported that a top al Qaeda lieutenant had met with MS-13 to seek help infiltrating the U.S.-Mexico border. Authorities said at the time that Adnan G. El Shukrijumah, a key al Qaeda cell leader for whom the U.S. government has offered a $5 million reward, was spotted in July in Tegucigalpa, Honduras, with MS-13 leaders.
    MS-13 is thought to have established a major smuggling center in Matamoros, Mexico, just south of Brownsville, Texas, from where it has arranged to bring illegal aliens from countries other than Mexico into the United States. In August, an FBI alert described El Shukrijumah as "armed and dangerous" and a major threat to homeland security.

This is a topic that’s troubling to me as a Libertarian (one of several related to these perilous times and this unconventional war being waged against us). I’m in favor of "open borders" and the right to immigrate — that is, the right to come to the U.S. and live here as a peaceful, productive member of society.

Of course, there is no right to come here and demand that others provide for you. And there’s no right to come here in order to violate the rights of others, i.e., pursue a career as a criminal or terrorist.

Thus, I find myself uncomfortable with the immigrant advocates, who seem most interested in increasing the number of "undocumented workers" who rely on government benefits, not work, and who illegally vote Democratic. And I find myself equally uncomfortable with the nativist, Tancredo-types who seem to want to cut legal immigration to nothing, station soldiers shoulder-to-shoulder along the Mexican border, and deport anyone who isn’t fluent in English.

I’d like to see some kind of rational, reasonable accommodation of the conflicting demands of liberty and security. Given the growing evidence of Islamofascist activity in Latin America, it’s reckless and foolish not to address the illegal crossings of the Mexican border.

How about a serious, highly effective effort to stop the flow of illegals (I’m open to suggestions) coupled with major easing of legal immigration? Make it relatively fast and simple for the kind of people we want (honest, hard-working, productive) to come here (perhaps on condition of no government dependency, i.e., ineligible for welfare, Medicaid, etc.), while making it much more difficult to get here illegally.

If those steps are taken, I think many people will be much more willing to entertain some kind of amnesty / guest worker program for those already here illegally, especially if they must go through the same screening/qualification process to be used for legal immigrants.

Of course, the "I hate furriners" mouth-breathers won’t be satisfied. Nor will the leftists who see dependency as a virtue and sneer at the self-reliant. Good.

If you’re a Libertarian bothered by even my proposed restrictions on the freedom to travel, I understand. But I don’t think you can just wish away the legitimate safety and security concerns in this day and age. I’m not a big fan of the aforementioned Rep. Tancredo, but he made sobering point:

    Mr. Tancredo recently said government reports show a 50 percent increase in the foreign nationals identified as other than Mexican crossing the U.S.-Mexico border. He said some illegals from nations identified as state sponsors of terrorism were paying as much as $50,000 to be smuggled into the United States.
    "They’re not paying that kind of money simply to work at a 7-11," he said.

You also have to wonder who has $50k available — not likely the unemployed Huahacan laborer looking for a job in the lettuce fields.

Update: Submitting this as a supper special at basil’s blog. Check out the other fine fare.

Subscribe To Site:

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments »

Mammalian! Mammalian!

Posted by Richard on June 30, 2005

A milestone! I’ve finally become a warm-blooded animal in the TTLB Ecosystem (see right sidebar; and isn’t "Adorable Little Rodent" just a PC way of calling you a rat?). Thanks, readers!

Of course, there are folks who’ll insist that I’m still rather cold-blooded. 😉

Subscribe To Site:

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment »

The core problem

Posted by Richard on June 30, 2005

Hugh Hewitt put it as clearly and succinctly as I’ve seen it put:

This is the core problem:  A horrific disfigurement of religious belief into a killing frenzy. It was the motivation behind 9/11, Bali, Madrid, and Beslan, and it is the motivation behind the terror is Iraq today.  The only solution –the only solution– is the creation of societies committed to religious pluralism. It takes a long, long time for such societies to develop, but a beginning has been made in Iraq, Lebanon and Afghanistan.  The president’s speech was an argument about why perseverance is not only necessary but in fact indispensable to survival of the West.  The cut-and-run caucus led by Ted and MoveOn and Howard et al simply refuses to look the evil in its face and deal with it.  Their dodge is to claim that our troops’ presence is the cause of the evil.  This laughable argument is at its heart a suicide note. 

If you still disagree — did you follow Hugh’s link and read Time’s "Inside the Mind of an Iraqi Suicide Bomber" ? You didn’t, did you? Go read it. Then spend some time at DanielPipes.org and at the Center for Islamic Pluralism. Read the material at MEMRI’s Jihad and Terrorism Studies Project.

Finally, when you really know something about Islamofascism and the fanatics who fuel it, you’re welcome to propose an alternative realistic plan for dealing with the problem.

Realistic. That eliminates "let the UN fix things" and "they’ll leave us alone if we leave them alone."

Subscribe To Site:

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

Carnival of Liberty announced

Posted by Richard on June 29, 2005

Oops, I meant to post this yesterday:

The first ever Carnival of Liberty will be presented by the Life, Liberty and Property Community of bloggers. The announcement is on the LLP group blog.

The group’s goal is to promote the ideals of life, liberty and property as inherent rights of all humans throughout the world.

The Carnival of Liberty will promote blogging and thinking about liberty and freedom. How to advance the cause, where there are problems, what we can do, who’s saying what, historical trends and ideas, liberty in the news, and much more.

Appropriately enough, it will be presented on the weekend of July 4th, the anniversary of the United States Declaration of Independence 229 years ago.

Please link to the Carnival announcement, submit posts, get your fellow bloggers excited. Entries are not limited to LLP bloggers.

Thank you,

Life, Liberty and Property Community of Bloggers

Subscribe To Site:

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »