Not a Lott to cheer about
Posted by Richard on November 15, 2006
Senate Republicans chose Trent Lott over Lamar Alexander as the minority whip. That’s choosing awful over terrible. Or maybe terrible over dreadful. It’s hard for me to keep the fine gradations of undesirability among these guys straight.
Dean Barnett pegged the sarcasm meter when he hailed the Senate Republicans for so quickly heeding the electorate’s plea for more Trent Lott. He continued:
Is it just me, or is it becoming increasingly apparent that the Republicans and Democrats are determined to engage in a two year dumb-off? If it weren’t for the fact that there are some very determined lunatics out there trying to kill us, this would be funny.
But they are out there, so it isn’t.
In the dumb-off scoring, the Dems can retake the lead by going with Rep. Murtha as House majority leader. But I suspect there will be plenty of lead changes in the next couple of years. The stupidity competition between the two parties is at the same time funny, sad, and infuriating. It’s also the cause of growing cynicism among the electorate, and I can’t decide whether that’s a good thing or a bad thing from a libertarian perspective.
It does disturb me that I have to depend on this collection of clueless chumps to make the right decisions regarding those very determined lunatics.
gorilla@large said
“The Gods themselves struggle in vain against the luck of fools.”
Smart people are predictable. You’ll go crazy trying to figure out what a morons going to do. This may be our safest course of action. You can’t hit a stupid target.
gorilla@large